Inside New Hampshire's Most Haunted Colonial Home: The James House Investigation
“The James House has a quality that serious investigators talk about but rarely put into words — it feels occupied in a way that its current emptiness doesn't explain. Whether that impression survives scientific scrutiny is exactly what the investigation is designed to determine.”
— Jason Hawes
Before I ever set up a single piece of equipment, I try to understand a location — its history, the people who lived there, and the stories that have followed it across the centuries. The James House in Hampton, New Hampshire stopped me in my tracks the moment I started digging into its past. This isn't just one of New England's oldest homes; it's a place where three hundred years of life, loss, and human experience have soaked into every timber and floorboard.
I've investigated hundreds of locations over the years, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that history matters. You can't walk into a place like the James House — a First Period colonial home with origins that predate the American Revolution by decades — and expect to understand what's happening there without first understanding what happened there. That's exactly why, before I touched a single piece of gear, I sat down to hear the stories. The history of this structure is remarkable on its own terms. Recognized as one of New Hampshire's finest surviving examples of First Period architecture, the James House has watched generations of families move through its rooms. It witnessed the birth of a nation, the upheaval of wars, the quiet grief of ordinary people, and the kind of slow, accumulated human experience that doesn't simply vanish when the last family member closes the door for the final time. Preservation efforts have kept this home standing when so many of its contemporaries have crumbled, and the people dedicated to that work deserve enormous credit. It's that preservation — the original timber frame still largely intact, the bones of the structure unchanged — that makes investigating a place like this so compelling and so challenging.
As a skeptic-first investigator, my job going into any location is to disprove the haunting. I'm not there to validate anyone's fears or confirm what people want to believe. I'm there to find the truth, and the truth often turns out to be far less supernatural than the stories suggest. Drafts through centuries-old window frames can sound like whispers. Settling timbers can crack like footsteps. Infrasound from nearby geological features or old HVAC systems can produce genuine feelings of unease — even dread — that visitors interpret as a presence. I've seen it dozens of times, and I never rule those explanations out first. But the reports coming out of the James House gave me enough to take seriously. Unexplained sounds, a persistent sense of being watched, encounters that multiple unconnected visitors have described in strikingly similar terms — these are the kinds of patterns that move a location up my list of places worth investigating properly.
What struck me most in the conversations leading up to our investigation was the consistency of the accounts. People weren't describing Hollywood-style apparitions or dramatic poltergeist activity. They were describing something quieter and, in some ways, more unsettling — a sense that the home's past residents hadn't entirely stepped aside. That kind of report, understated and repeated, is exactly what I pay attention to. It suggests genuine, unexplained experience rather than embellishment. The James House has a quality that serious investigators talk about but rarely put into words: it feels occupied in a way that its current emptiness doesn't explain. Whether that impression survives scientific scrutiny is exactly what the investigation is designed to determine.
Going into the James House investigation, I was carrying three hundred years of context — family histories, paranormal accounts, and the weight of extraordinary preservation work done by people who believe this place deserves to survive. My role is to honor that history by approaching it honestly. If there are rational explanations for what people are experiencing here, I will find them. If something remains unexplained after every natural cause has been eliminated, I will say that too — clearly, and without exaggeration. That's the standard I've held to since the early days of TAPS, and it doesn't change because a location is old or famous or genuinely fascinating. The James House is all three. Now it's time to find out what it actually is.
The pre-investigation history of the James House left me with more questions than answers — which is exactly where I want to be walking into a serious investigation. The stories are compelling, the location is extraordinary, and the reports warrant a thorough, skeptic-first examination. Stay with us as we go inside and let the evidence speak for itself.