The Fayes House Investigation: Did a Woman Die Alone Here for Days?
“Multiple team members reported the same sensation, in the same location, without any prior communication between them — that's not something I dismiss, and it's not something I can fully explain yet.”
— Jason Hawes
Some locations carry a weight to them the moment you walk through the door — not supernatural, not yet, but human. The Fayes House, now home to Rechic retail store, is one of those places. The story goes that a woman fell down the stairs here and wasn't found for days, and ever since, people have reported sounds they can't explain, a creeping feeling of being watched, and activity that has rattled even the most level-headed people who spend time inside.
I want to be upfront about how I approach every single investigation, and this one was no different: I walked into the Fayes House looking for reasons to explain what people have been experiencing. That is not me being dismissive of what witnesses have reported. That is me respecting them enough to take it seriously. If something genuinely unexplained is happening here, the only way to confirm it is to first eliminate every rational possibility on the table. Anything less than that is entertainment, not investigation.
The history of this location matters. A woman reportedly suffered a fatal fall down the stairs inside this house, and the fact that she wasn't discovered for days adds a layer of tragedy that lingers in the walls of a place whether you believe in the paranormal or not. Trauma has a way of shaping how we experience a space — and that psychological imprint is something I always factor in before I ever pull out a piece of equipment. When people walk into a location knowing that story, their senses are already primed. Sounds that would be ignored in any other building suddenly feel significant. That is not paranormal activity. That is the human brain doing exactly what it was designed to do. My job is to separate those two things.
We spent the full night inside the Fayes House, moving systematically through every room and focusing particular attention on the staircase area and the rooms surrounding it, given that those spaces carry the most reported activity. We documented everything — audio, video, environmental readings — and we didn't rush. One of the most common mistakes in this field is reacting to every sound and shadow in real time without stopping to identify the source. Old houses breathe. They settle. HVAC systems cycle. Wood expands and contracts. Plumbing knocks. Before I call anything unexplained, I need to have physically walked the building, mapped its sounds, and understood its structure. That process alone accounts for the majority of what people report in locations like this. During our time inside, there were moments that genuinely gave me pause — audio captures that didn't immediately line up with a known source, and at least one instance where multiple team members reported the same sensation independently, in the same area, without any prior communication. I'm not ready to call that conclusive, but I'm also not ready to dismiss it. Those are exactly the kinds of data points that keep a case open.
What I can tell you is this: the Fayes House is not a location I'm prepared to write off. There are elements here that warrant a closer look, and there are elements that have straightforward explanations once you take the time to find them. The staircase, given its history, was a focal point of our investigation, and the environmental conditions in that part of the building are worth noting — drafts, structural sounds, and temperature variations that could easily be misinterpreted by someone who didn't know what they were looking at. But misinterpretation and fabrication are two different things. The people reporting activity here are not making things up. They are experiencing something. The question — the only question that matters — is what that something actually is.
After a full night inside the Fayes House, my verdict is inconclusive — and in this field, inconclusive is an honest answer, not a cop-out. There is nothing here I can point to and say definitively that it defies explanation, but there are enough data points that I'm not ready to close the book on this location either. Watch the footage, weigh the evidence, and decide for yourself.