The Fight to Keep the 'Conjuring House' Name: What's Really at Stake for One of Paranormal's Most Famous Locations

When people think of the most iconic paranormal locations in the world, the Conjuring House in Rhode Island sits at the top of that list. For years, this property — historically known as the Arnold Estate — has carried that name in the public consciousness, drawing investigators, historians, and curious visitors from around the globe. Now, there's a new battle underway, and this time it isn't about ghosts. It's about who gets to control the name itself.

I want to be straight with you, the way I always try to be: I go into every situation looking for the logical explanation first. I don't jump to conclusions, I follow the evidence, and I let the documents speak for themselves. That's exactly what I'm doing here. What I've uncovered surrounding the trademark application for the name 'Conjuring House' — Serial Number 99449309, publicly available through the USPTO — raises serious questions that every person who has ever supported this property deserves to understand.

Let me walk you through what we're dealing with. Two LLC's are at the center of this — Haunted Homes LLC, registered in Connecticut, and Summit & Stone LLC, registered in Rhode Island. Both are publicly searchable through their respective state business registries, and I encourage everyone to pull those records and look at them with their own eyes. What concerns me isn't just that a trademark application has been filed for a name that the public has used organically for years in connection with a specific physical location — it's the claimed first-use dates listed in that application. When you line those dates up against the actual documented timeline of how and when the name 'Conjuring House' entered public use and became synonymous with the Arnold Estate property, things don't add up. That discrepancy matters, legally and ethically.

The timeline is something I break down in detail in the video because I think it's the most important piece of this puzzle. A new website was also created as part of what appears to be a coordinated effort, and when you look at the sequence of events — the GoFundMe, the T-shirt sales, the attempts to redirect web traffic, the pressure on the location itself — a clearer picture starts to emerge. This isn't a random filing. If the trademark were granted to parties operating through these LLC's, it could functionally give them control over how the property markets itself, whether it can fundraise under that name, and how people find it online. For a location that depends on public support and recognition to operate and preserve its history, that's not a minor inconvenience. That's potentially existential.

Here's where I stand, and I want to be clear that I'm speaking based on the publicly available records and my own analysis of the documented timeline. The name 'Conjuring House' grew organically out of the property's real history and its connection to the Perron family's story and the subsequent cultural footprint of the film based on those events. That name belongs, in spirit and in practice, to the place itself and to the community that has rallied around it for years. The opposition to this trademark application has now been formally instituted by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board — meaning this case is officially moving forward for review. That's a significant development. It means the argument that this name should not be privately captured by outside LLC's will now be heard through a legitimate legal process. I think that's the right outcome, and I'll continue to follow every development as it unfolds.

This is one of those situations where doing your own research isn't just encouraged — it's essential. Pull the USPTO filing, check the state business registries, look at the timeline, and draw your own conclusions. What I can tell you is that the Conjuring House has stood as a landmark of paranormal history because of the people who believe in preserving it, and that connection is worth protecting.