The Fight to Keep the Conjuring House Name: Trademark Battle Threatens One of Paranormal's Most Iconic Locations
“The name 'Conjuring House' didn't come from a marketing meeting — it grew from decades of public recognition, and it belongs to the history of that place and the community that has supported it. The documents are public, the records are accessible, and the timeline speaks for itself.”
— Jason Hawes
What happens when the name of one of the most recognized paranormal locations in the world becomes a legal weapon? That's exactly what we're facing right now with The Conjuring House — and I want to make sure the community has the full picture, straight from the documents, straight from the records, and without the spin.
For years, the property on Round Top Road in Burrillville, Rhode Island has carried two names. To those who know its deep history, it's The Arnold Estate. But to the rest of the world — to the millions of people who watched the Conjuring films, who followed paranormal investigations there, who donated, purchased merchandise, and made the trip to experience it themselves — it's The Conjuring House. That name didn't come from a marketing meeting. It grew organically out of decades of public recognition, and it belongs, in every meaningful sense, to the history of that place and the community that has supported it.
So when I started digging into a trademark application filed under Serial Number 99449309 — which you can look up yourself at tsdr.uspto.gov — and cross-referencing it against two LLC registrations, one in Connecticut called Haunted Homes LLC and one in Rhode Island called Summit & Stone LLC, I wanted to lay out the facts before I shared any opinion. Both registries are publicly available, and I encourage every one of you to pull those records and read them for yourselves. What I found was a coordinated effort — two entities working in tandem — attempting to trademark the name 'Conjuring House' in a way that, if successful, could shut down the property's GoFundMe, its T-shirt sales, redirect web traffic away from the legitimate site, and ultimately strip the location of the identity it has built over years of public engagement. The claimed first-use dates on that trademark application deserve particular scrutiny. When you line them up against the actual documented timeline of events — and I walk through that timeline in detail in the video — the dates don't hold up the way you'd expect them to if this were a straightforward, legitimate claim.
Here's what matters most to me as an investigator and as someone who has spent decades trying to bring credibility to this field: I go into every situation looking for the most logical, provable explanation before I jump to conclusions. The same principle applies here. I'm not asking anyone to take my word for it. I'm asking you to look at the documents, look at the registry records, look at the timeline, and ask yourself whether the story being told by these LLC's lines up with the publicly available evidence. A new website was also created — and the timing of that launch is worth noting when you map it against everything else. When you start connecting those dots, a clearer picture begins to emerge about what this effort is really about.
The good news, and this is significant, is that our formal opposition has now been instituted by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. That means this case is officially moving through the legal process and will receive a proper review. This is not a small thing. It means the TTAB found sufficient grounds to institute the proceeding, and it means the people behind these LLC's will have to make their case in front of an actual review body rather than simply having a trademark granted without challenge. The Conjuring House has history on its side, public recognition on its side, and a community that has shown up time and time again to support it. I believe that matters, and I believe the record will reflect it.
My verdict on this situation is the same as it would be on any investigation: follow the evidence, not the narrative someone else is trying to sell you. The documents are public, the registry records are accessible, and the timeline speaks for itself. I'll continue to update this community every step of the way as this opposition moves forward — because protecting the history and integrity of this location is something I take seriously.