The Conjuring House: Where Things Stand, What Comes Next, and Why the Truth Matters

The Conjuring House has been at the center of controversy, legal battles, and no shortage of misinformation for a while now — and tonight, I'm sitting down live to talk about all of it openly and honestly. If you've been following the situation and wondering whether this is finally over, what the legal developments actually mean, or where the house goes from here, I want to give you real answers instead of the noise that's been circulating. This is a conversation I've been wanting to have with this community for some time.

Let me be straightforward with you, because that's the only way I know how to operate. There has been a tremendous amount of misinformation floating around about The Conjuring House — the property in Harrisville, Rhode Island that inspired the 2013 film and has been a focal point of paranormal discussion for decades. Some of it is well-intentioned speculation, some of it is flat-out wrong, and some of it has real consequences for the people involved and for the broader paranormal community's credibility. Tonight's live stream is about cutting through all of that and having an honest, grounded conversation.

For those who need a quick refresher, The Conjuring House — formally known as the Perron family farmhouse — has a long and complicated history that extends well beyond the Hollywood version of events. The Perron family lived there in the 1970s and reported genuinely disturbing experiences. Ed and Lorraine Warren investigated the property. Since then, the house has changed hands, been operated as a paranormal attraction, and has been the subject of ongoing disputes — legal and otherwise — about ownership, access, and how the property is being used and represented. The recent legal developments have brought a lot of those tensions to a head, and people deserve to know what's actually happening versus what's being sensationalized.

My approach to anything involving The Conjuring House — or any location, for that matter — has always been the same: start with skepticism, look for natural explanations, and only consider paranormal conclusions when the evidence genuinely demands it. That discipline is just as important when evaluating claims about legal situations and ownership disputes as it is when you're in a dark basement with an EMF reader. Rumors spread fast in this community, and I've seen good people get hurt by misinformation that nobody bothered to verify. Tonight I want to address the specific claims that have been circulating, share what I actually know, and be honest about what I don't know — because that distinction matters.

What I can tell you going into tonight is this: the situation is not as simple as some people are making it out to be, and it's also not as dramatic as others are claiming. There are real questions about the future of the house, about who controls the narrative around it, and about what responsible stewardship of a location like this actually looks like. These are questions worth taking seriously, and they're questions this community is well-positioned to think through thoughtfully. I also want to hear from you — your questions, your theories, your concerns. That's what these live conversations are for. The paranormal community is strongest when it holds itself to a high standard, and that starts with honest dialogue.

Tonight at 8:30 PM EST, I'll be going live to lay out everything I know, address the misinformation directly, and answer your questions in real time. Whatever comes next for The Conjuring House, the community deserves accurate information and a clear-eyed perspective — and that's exactly what I'm committed to providing. Come ready to talk.