The Conjuring House Legal Battle: What It Means for the Future of the Property and Paranormal Access
“Hype doesn't make a haunting real — and a famous name attached to a building doesn't change my methodology. What matters is what the evidence actually shows when you strip away the noise.”
— Jason Hawes
The Conjuring House has been at the center of controversy for years — not just because of what people claim happens inside its walls, but because of the very human drama that surrounds it. Tonight I'm going live at 8:30 PM EST to talk openly about the recent legal developments, clear up the misinformation that's been circulating, and answer your questions directly. If you've been following this situation, you know it's been anything but straightforward.
I've been getting messages constantly asking the same questions: Is this finally over? What happens to the house now? Where does everything stand? I get it — this story has had more twists than most investigations I've ever worked, and people deserve straight answers instead of the rumor mill that's been running overtime online. Tonight's live stream is my chance to sit down, talk plainly, and give the community the real picture as I understand it.
Let me be clear about something from the start: my approach to the Conjuring House has always been the same as every other location I've ever investigated. I go in skeptical. I go in looking for the rational explanation first. The history of that property in Harrisville, Rhode Island — the Perron family's experiences, the claims that inspired the film, the years of investigators and owners and media attention — none of that changes my methodology. Hype doesn't make a haunting real. A famous name attached to a building doesn't make it haunted. What matters is what the evidence actually shows when you strip away the noise.
The legal situation surrounding the house has created a layer of complexity that goes beyond paranormal investigation. There's been a significant amount of misinformation floating around online — claims about what the legal outcomes mean, what access to the property looks like going forward, and what the future of investigations there might be. I don't think it serves anyone — the community, the property, or the honest pursuit of answers — to let bad information fill the vacuum. That's exactly why I'm having this conversation publicly and directly with the people who care about it most. You deserve to hear it from someone who has been connected to this story and isn't interested in sensationalizing it for clicks.
What happens next with a property like this matters beyond just one house. The Conjuring House has become a focal point for the paranormal community — a symbol, for better or worse, of where investigation culture, entertainment, and genuine inquiry collide. How situations like this get resolved sets a precedent for how historic, allegedly haunted locations are treated, who gets access, and whether serious investigation is even possible when a property becomes a media phenomenon. I've spent decades fighting for credibility in this field, and part of that fight means being willing to say hard things out loud: the story around a location can sometimes become bigger than the investigation itself, and that's when we lose sight of what we're actually trying to find out. Tonight I want to bring it back to the facts, the questions, and the community that keeps this work meaningful.
I don't have all the answers — nobody does right now — but I'd rather have an honest conversation in public than let speculation run the story. Join me tonight at 8:30 PM EST and bring your questions, your theories, and your skepticism. That's exactly the kind of community I've always wanted to build around this work.