The Conjuring House: What I Really Think About One of America's Most Infamous Haunted Locations

Few locations in the paranormal world carry as much weight — or as much baggage — as the Conjuring House in Harrisville, Rhode Island. When I sat down to answer your questions about this place live, I knew the conversation was going to go deep. There's a lot of myth, a lot of Hollywood, and somewhere buried underneath all of it, a real location with a real history that deserves an honest look.

Let me be straight with you from the jump: I approach every location the same way, whether it's a place nobody's heard of or one that's had a major motion picture made about it. The Conjuring House — formally known as the Perron family farmhouse — is no different. Before I'm willing to say something paranormal is happening anywhere, I need to rule out every possible natural explanation first. That's not pessimism, that's the job. And frankly, that's the only way any of this means anything.

The history of that property is genuinely compelling, and I want to separate that from the Hollywood version people are most familiar with. The Perron family lived in that farmhouse through the 1970s and reported experiences that, by any account, were deeply unsettling to them. Ed and Lorraine Warren investigated the location during that period, and their involvement is where things get complicated for a lot of people in this field — including me. I have enormous respect for the history of paranormal investigation, but I also think it's important that we ask hard questions and hold every piece of reported evidence to a real standard. That's not disrespect. That's how you find the truth.

When fans and followers ask me about the Conjuring House during live sessions like this one, the questions almost always fall into a few categories: Do I think it's actually haunted? Do I think the Warren cases hold up to scrutiny? Would I investigate there? These are fair questions, and I try to answer them honestly rather than just telling people what they want to hear. The location has changed hands over the years, and what gets reported by different owners and visitors varies quite a bit — which is itself worth paying attention to. Consistency in reported phenomena across different witnesses who don't know each other is one of the things I look for when I'm trying to determine whether something credible might be happening at a location.

What I keep coming back to with the Conjuring House is this: strip away the movie, strip away the legend that's built up around it, and you still have a property with a long, documented history of reports going back well before anyone was trying to capitalize on it. That doesn't prove the paranormal. But it does mean the location warrants serious, methodical investigation — the kind where you spend real time there, you test environmental factors, you document everything, and you resist the urge to jump to conclusions just because the setting feels dramatic. I've said it a thousand times and I'll say it again — the most important tool any investigator brings into a location isn't a piece of equipment. It's a willingness to be wrong. Talking through cases like this with the community is exactly why I do these live sessions, because the conversation itself sharpens the thinking.

The Conjuring House remains one of the most fascinating and most complicated locations in American paranormal history — and that's precisely why it deserves better than hype. My verdict isn't a simple haunted or not haunted; it's that the location warrants serious, unbiased investigation free from the weight of its own legend. That's a conversation I'm always happy to keep having.